Niels007007
New Member
- First Name
- Niels
- Joined
- May 13, 2025
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Netherlands
- Vehicle(s)
- Mostly imaginary
- Thread starter
- #1
Looking at some images of the FL5 rear suspension, there appear to be two lateral lower links. A long one carrying the spring, and a short one placed in front of it.
Initially, this seemed to me to cause some bump steer, as the unequal length means the shorter one covers more of an arc than the long arm as the suspension moves up/down. However, just as I was going to ask, I think I figured it out.
The trailing arm rigidly mounts to the upright. That means the lateral link that is mounted nearest to the chassis mount of the trailing arm, moves up and down less than the rearward placed lateral link, the one where the spring is situated. See my amazing drawing.
To have no bump steer, the lateral movement caused by the arc the lateral arms make as the suspension travels, needs to be the same for front and rear lateral link. Since the front one moves up/down less, it needs to be a shorter length arm to have the same lateral movement.
You can draw a triangle from the chassis mounts, and you can see that the length of the forward lateral link would basically make it fall on the diagonal line, once we account for the fact that the forward link is placed outward a bit more.
So my question is answered but I thought I'd post it anyway since maybe that is interesting.
Cheers,
Niels
Of course, bump steer is also a part of suspension design. It is very likely Honda engineered the mounting points so that they get a certain bump steer versus wheel travel curve, it may very well not be exactly zero. Bump toe in would add stability, bump toe out would improve turn-in, at the expense of stability. If anyone has the full kinematics curves of the suspension feel free to post them!
Initially, this seemed to me to cause some bump steer, as the unequal length means the shorter one covers more of an arc than the long arm as the suspension moves up/down. However, just as I was going to ask, I think I figured it out.
The trailing arm rigidly mounts to the upright. That means the lateral link that is mounted nearest to the chassis mount of the trailing arm, moves up and down less than the rearward placed lateral link, the one where the spring is situated. See my amazing drawing.
To have no bump steer, the lateral movement caused by the arc the lateral arms make as the suspension travels, needs to be the same for front and rear lateral link. Since the front one moves up/down less, it needs to be a shorter length arm to have the same lateral movement.
You can draw a triangle from the chassis mounts, and you can see that the length of the forward lateral link would basically make it fall on the diagonal line, once we account for the fact that the forward link is placed outward a bit more.
So my question is answered but I thought I'd post it anyway since maybe that is interesting.
Cheers,
Niels
Of course, bump steer is also a part of suspension design. It is very likely Honda engineered the mounting points so that they get a certain bump steer versus wheel travel curve, it may very well not be exactly zero. Bump toe in would add stability, bump toe out would improve turn-in, at the expense of stability. If anyone has the full kinematics curves of the suspension feel free to post them!
Sponsored