Manual_man
Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Like the title says...
Sponsored
Tons of them out there and it's pretty much unanimously praised and viewed as a performance improvement in pretty much every metric aside from a negligable loss of ~5hp, which, even then has been proven false on every dyno, comparing to the 10th gen baseline on the same dyno.I test drove a new BRZ and it's so small it's like a Miata with a hard top. But it's such a good value, imo.
I'm just not sold yet on the '22 Si as having any improvement in performance over the previous gen. I know it's never been a "numbers" car but I'm waiting for some more reviews with performance metrics to prove it's not a step backwards.
They're all ready out there on youtube, bud. Lots of baseline dyno tests comparing it to stock 10th.Still waiting on the numbers. Hp/tq numbers can be meaningless if it doesn't translate to actual improvements in time.
I'd like to see a full Car & Driver test.
Yeah... if you're interested in those things I think you're looking at the wrong vehicle. Civics have always been slow lol. They're just fun to drive and make good noises.I'm talking about performance times. 0-60, quart ler mile, trap speed, passing etc.
So far I've only seen Motor Trend test numbers and they are disappointing.
0-60 its pretty close but the 10th gen beats it by a couple 10ths of a second. Around the track the 11th beats the 10th.It's fine if they're slow. I love slow car fast.
But I still want to know if it's slower than 10th gen. Might look at that instead if used prices come down a bit.