VLJ
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2024
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 50
- Location
- Northern California
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Civic Type R Boost Blue Pearl
It absolutely makes sense, insofar as critics of the CTR module feel that the problem with the CTR's suspension performance isn't the stiffness, per se, but rather the overabundance of damping. Topher's main point was that the suspension behaves differently, and better, with the ITS module; not because it's less stiff, which it also is, but because the adaptive portion is more linear, and simply superior. He claims that the bounciness is reduced well beyond the basic difference in stiffness between the two modules.
I think what I would want, at least in theory, would be the firmness of the CTR, with the damping of the ITS. I'd like to retain the edginess of the CTR's stiffer handling, with the bump compliance/chassis composure of the ITS.
I think what I would want, at least in theory, would be the firmness of the CTR, with the damping of the ITS. I'd like to retain the edginess of the CTR's stiffer handling, with the bump compliance/chassis composure of the ITS.
Sponsored