Opinions on PRL HVI filter

[knuckles]

I recently picked up a used HVI for my FL5. The filter looked like it needed oil, so I went down the rabbit hole of reading about the filters. I’ve read a lot of people saying the PRL filter has poor filtration and pulls in a lot of dust. What is your experience? Would you advise getting the AEM DryFlow as a replacement? Those that have it, do you have any issues with sealing as it is a bit larger?

Sponsored

 

[Cueyo]

Technically running an oiled filter will never be as good as a dry filter. Knowing what I do now, I would go with the dry flow filter always. Not because I experienced any bad things from the oiled one, but rather because it's less stress that the engine will get damaged.

I should mention I've run the k20c2 pro hvi with the oiled filter on my old car and it never sucked in dust afaik.

 

[CTR]

I've had my PRL HVI on my car for about 20K miles and when I recently had the intake removed to change my transmission fluid it was cleaner than I expected inside the piping. I don't live in a super dusty environment though.

 

[Montrix]

I don't think anyone's reported issues with the PRL oiled filter, but I personally run the AEM dry flow. Seals perfectly for me, it's slightly larger than the MAF housing but once you tighten the clamp it seals just fine. There's a thread on it too if you want some more info: https://www.civicxi.com/forum/threads/aem-dryflow-filter-for-prl-hvi-intake.55457/

 

[Jon_To]

Second that. I run the AEM dry filter. Piece of mind over...

 

[MrBBQ]

I ran the AEM Dryflow filter when I ran the PRL HVI intake. My PRL filter was overly porous and let in fine dust. Coated the inner intake tract with a layer of fine dust. Car didn't even have 5k miles on it. I have two AEM Dryflow filters for sale if anybody is interested, one brand new and one slightly used (<500 miles). I switched to the COBB intake, so I don't need them anymore. I'll be posting up The PRL HVI intake, x2 AEM dryflow filters, and TSP Coupler for sale soon.

 

[knuckles]

I don't think anyone's reported issues with the PRL oiled filter, but I personally run the AEM dry flow. Seals perfectly for me, it's slightly larger than the MAF housing but once you tighten the clamp it seals just fine. There's a thread on it too if you want some more info: https://www.civicxi.com/forum/threads/aem-dryflow-filter-for-prl-hvi-intake.55457/

Would running a t bolt clamp be more assurance on the seal over the worm clamp?

I ran the AEM Dryflow filter when I ran the PRL HVI intake. My PRL filter was overly porous and let in fine dust. Coated the inner intake tract with a layer of fine dust. Car didn't even have 5k miles on it. I have two AEM Dryflow filters for sale if anybody is interested, one brand new and one slightly used (<500 miles). I switched to the COBB intake, so I don't need them anymore. I'll be posting up The PRL HVI intake, x2 AEM dryflow filters, and TSP Coupler for sale soon.

Damn. I just ordered one last night.

 

[Montrix]

Would running a t bolt clamp be more assurance on the seal over the worm clamp?

Damn. I just ordered one last night.

I wouldn’t think so, I was actually in the engine bay and pulled on the filter and it didn’t budge in the slightest lol. Someone in the original thread used some silicone tape in between the filter and housing but I think that’s overkill imo. Based on the position of the filter and housing, I think even without a perfect seal it would be hard for dust to get past the filter, but once it’s tightened it’s good to go

@MrBBQ’s experience is the only one I’ve read of having issues with the PRL filter but it makes sense. Their filter is way more porous(hence the oil) but I’ve just had bad experiences with oiled filters in the past and didn’t want to risk it. I would wager most people running the PRL filter have not only never cleaned it but don’t even know they’re supposed to oil it lol.

Sponsored