blueroadster
Senior Member
I just use the OEM filters. If not available, WIX XP.
Sponsored
I told grok to look only at formal verified test results and manufacturer's data, and not consider any anecdotal user reports or opinions. however, I neglected to tell it to only use "quantifiable numeric data" and not "high" "low" etc.I dunno about all the data but I know for a fact, amsoil filters flow like shit and aren’t preferred in Motorsports due to that. They do filter very well tho
no offense to anyone here. I love their oil but not a fan of their oil filters myself for my car.
I wonder if anything else there was wrong
| Filter Model (Brand) | Filtration Efficiency | Particle Size Filtered | Dirt Holding Capacity | Oil Flow | Bypass Valve Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fram Ultra Synthetic XG7317 | 99.96% | 20 microns | 13.6 grams | 5.23 psid at 30 LPM | 13 PSI |
| Amsoil EA15K20 | 98.7% | 20 microns | 25 grams | 9-11 GPM | 12-16 PSI |
| Bosch Premium 3323 | 99% | 20 microns | 14 grams | 9-11 GPM | 8-11 PSI |
| Royal Purple 10-2867 | 99.08% | 20 microns | 10.1 grams | 8.84 psid at 30 LPM | 12-16 PSI |
| ACDelco Gold PF2057 | 96.49% | 20 microns | 9.1 grams | 6.82 psid at 30 LPM | 8-11 PSI |
| Fram Synthetic Endurance FE7317 | 99% | 20 microns | 25 grams | 9-11 GPM | 11-17 PSI |
| Mobil 1 M1-110 | 99.6% | 25 microns | 28 grams | 9-11 GPM | 12-16 PSI |
| Purolator Boss PBL14610 | 61.80% | 20 microns | 12.5 grams | 6.82 psid at 30 LPM | 14-18 PSI |
| WIX 57356 | 99% | 23 microns | 18 grams | 9-11 GPM | 8-11 PSI |
| K&N HP-1010 | 94.9% | 21 microns | 4.5 grams | 9-11 GPM | 12-16 PSI |
| Honda OEM 15400-PLM-A02 (Honeywell/Fram) | 95% | 20 microns | 13 grams | 9-11 GPM | 11-17 PSI |
| Filter Model (Brand) | Hot PSID at 3 GPM | Hot PSID at 11 GPM | Cold PSID at 3 GPM | Cold PSID at 11 GPM | Bypass Valve Pressure | Other Flow Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsoil EA15K20 | 1.3 PSI | 12.3 PSI | 7.8 PSI | 43.9 PSI | 12-16 PSI | Highest restriction at high flow; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminant load in separate test |
| Mobil 1 M1-110 | 1.1 PSI | 8.5 PSI | 5.1 PSI | 36.6 PSI | 12-16 PSI | Lowest restriction overall; 5.5 GPM max flow in additional data; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminants |
| K&N HP-1010 | 1.4 PSI | 11.1 PSI | 6.5 PSI | 45.9 PSI | 11-17 PSI | Moderate restriction; flow drops to 8 L/min after 17g contaminants |
| Fram XG7317 Ultra Synthetic | 1.2 PSI (equivalent Mann test) | 9.2 PSI (equivalent Mann test) | 6.7 PSI (equivalent Mann test) | 41.5 PSI (equivalent Mann test) | 13 PSI | Balanced; max flow 9-11 GPM; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminants; 24 PSI total restriction in pump test |
| Royal Purple 10-2867 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12-16 PSI | No PSID data in tests; marketed flow not quantified |
| Mann HU 719/7 (high-flow equivalent) | 1.2 PSI | 9.2 PSI | 6.7 PSI | 41.5 PSI | 8-11 PSI | Low restriction; used as proxy for similar designs |
| WIX 57356 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8-11 PSI | Max flow 9-11 GPM; 22 PSI restriction in pump test |
| Bosch Premium 3323 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8-11 PSI | Max flow 9-11 GPM; no PSID |
| Purolator Boss PBL14610 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 14-18 PSI | No PSID; flow drops noted at 6.82 PSI in prior ISO data |
| ACDelco Gold PF2057 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8-11 PSI | No PSID |
| Honda OEM 15400-PLM-A02 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11-17 PSI | Max flow 9-11 GPM; no PSID |
Highest restriction at high flow makes sense. Amsoil filter’s bypass is more “active” than most due to pressures built up by slower flownext I asked it to compare quantifiable flow and psid:
Filter Model (Brand) Hot PSID at 3 GPM Hot PSID at 11 GPM Cold PSID at 3 GPM Cold PSID at 11 GPM Bypass Valve Pressure Other Flow Notes Amsoil EA15K20 1.3 PSI 12.3 PSI 7.8 PSI 43.9 PSI 12-16 PSI Highest restriction at high flow; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminant load in separate test Mobil 1 M1-110 1.1 PSI 8.5 PSI 5.1 PSI 36.6 PSI 12-16 PSI Lowest restriction overall; 5.5 GPM max flow in additional data; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminants K&N HP-1010 1.4 PSI 11.1 PSI 6.5 PSI 45.9 PSI 11-17 PSI Moderate restriction; flow drops to 8 L/min after 17g contaminants Fram XG7317 Ultra Synthetic 1.2 PSI (equivalent Mann test) 9.2 PSI (equivalent Mann test) 6.7 PSI (equivalent Mann test) 41.5 PSI (equivalent Mann test) 13 PSI Balanced; max flow 9-11 GPM; flow drops to 8 L/min after 33g contaminants; 24 PSI total restriction in pump test Royal Purple 10-2867 N/A N/A N/A N/A 12-16 PSI No PSID data in tests; marketed flow not quantified Mann HU 719/7 (high-flow equivalent) 1.2 PSI 9.2 PSI 6.7 PSI 41.5 PSI 8-11 PSI Low restriction; used as proxy for similar designs WIX 57356 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8-11 PSI Max flow 9-11 GPM; 22 PSI restriction in pump test Bosch Premium 3323 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8-11 PSI Max flow 9-11 GPM; no PSID Purolator Boss PBL14610 N/A N/A N/A N/A 14-18 PSI No PSID; flow drops noted at 6.82 PSI in prior ISO data ACDelco Gold PF2057 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8-11 PSI No PSID Honda OEM 15400-PLM-A02 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11-17 PSI Max flow 9-11 GPM; no PSID
not sure what you mean by "hamp"Highest restriction at high flow makes sense. Amsoil filter’s bypass is more “active” than most due to pressures built up by slower flow
great filter tho. It filters very very well. Great on a daily. Not so much on something U wanna abuse some tho
In regards to the Honda filter. Is that the hamp one? Cuz the hamp one is actually solid. Just overpriced a bit imo
No nonot sure what you mean by "hamp"
My understanding was that the current Honda filter is a low end (i.e. not synthetic) filter made by Honeywell/Fram
Grok says:
The 15400-PLM-A02 uses a cellulose blend media and construction similar to FRAM's basic Extra Guard PH7317.
It has about 67 percent efficiency at 20 microns, which is lower than premium options like the Ultra Synthetic XG7317 at 99 percent plus.
Cut-open analyses show it has solid build quality for OEM use, with no major flaws reported in high-heat or aggressive driving scenarios. However, it is not equivalent to the premium XG7317, which has synthetic media for better dirt holding and flow.
Agreed. Even the best oil filter will go to shit due to extended drain intervals. For sure.Plenty of oil filter choices. If the OEM filter is good enough according to Honda, I would use that or a similar filter. Most important IMHO is changing both the oil and filter at the same time and every 3-5k miles.
Regarding oil filter micron ratings, just stick with something similar to OEM. A new oil filter with claims of screening at 20 microns will screen even finer particles as it becomes clogged over time. Eventually, the media will become too restrictive and the filter will switch to bypass mode.
An example of an oil filter where claims are rather bold include TP filters such as this one (a.k.a. Mortbee or Trasko). A new TP oil filter claims screening at 1/10th of a micron and includes an 8-10 micron mesh screen at the top of the filter when it switches to bypass mode. In this case, the filtration media begins at a point where it is too restrictive and quickly switches to bypass mode. When that happens, all of the oil is then pushed through an 8-10 micron mesh screen at the top of the filter that does not have much surface area. As a result, the TP oil filter will quickly clog resulting in a not so much fun time for your engine.
Here is an example of a TP filter that is more functional as a paper weight.
![]()
From quick search: "HAMP" stands for "Honda After Market Parts"No no
I’m sorry. I did a shit job explaining. Sorry. So there’s the Mickey Mouse crappy stock filter right?
but then there’s another blue Honda filter. It’s made by a company called hamp. Internals are different. Filters better and flows better too.
sorry about that bro.
15400-RTA-003 is the "better" Honda oil filter (made in Japan)
15400-PLM-A02 is the Honda oil filter people on the internet say is not good (made in USA)
I haven't had a problem with either one but I go for the Japan made version if it's available![]()
Correct. Only issue with the hamp is its price. Only because cheaper filters that perform the same or better exist. For folks worried about warranty, can’t go wrong with the hamp. It’s a solid option imo.From quick search: "HAMP" stands for "Honda After Market Parts"
the filter you are referring to might be H1540-RTA-003 which, per Grok, is a step up from the A02 (cheap Fram), and is designed for VTEC/iVTEC setups and provides solid filtration (around 95-99% efficiency at 20 microns based on similar designs) with a unique relief valve for better pressure in aggressive driving. It is manufactured by Mahle Tennex, a division of the German company Mahle, and it's produced in Japan or the USA depending on the batch. Mahle manufactures oil filters under their own name and the Knecht brand, which they acquired in 1996. They also produce OEM oil filters branded for vehicle manufacturers like Honda, Harley-Davidson, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche.
indeed it is, per this post :
Since I change my filter at every oil change, and keep OCI to between 4,000 to 5,000 miles, I don't believe that filter choice makes much of a difference.Correct. Only issue with the hamp is its price. Only because cheaper filters that perform the same or better exist. For folks worried about warranty, can’t go wrong with the hamp. It’s a solid option imo.